Trump continues to lead pack in 4G mobile and desktop performance
Carly crushes debate say political pundits, but her website needs a speed boost
Bush and Christie strategically streamline sites to increase speeds, again
Three out of four undercard candidate sites best the primetime pack
SAN FRANCISCO – SEPTEMBER 17, 2015 – The second Republican presidential debates on CNN last night didn’t produce any major fireworks or scuffles, though the discussion was often heated and the attention and attacks on frontrunner Donald Trump were relentless. But, Trump’s website performance before, during, and after the debate continued to solidly outpace his opponents with sub-five second response times on both mobile and desktop. All eyes were also on Carly Fiorina to see how she performed after moving up from the undercard to primetime. While some headlines say she “crushed” it, her website performance continued to languish in the bottom third of the Republican candidate pool. The candidates’ websites were measured continuously by AppDynamics, a leading application intelligence company, and summary data was collected the day before the debate and again, during, and immediately following the debate.
The Bush and Christie campaigns repeated a maneuver they used for the first debate, which was to significantly reduce the weight of their home pages so that they would load much faster on debate night, when one would expect a significant spike in traffic. The “Jeb 2016” site loaded more than twice as fast on debate night, and the Christie site shaved more than 40 percent off its load time.
“The Bush and Christie campaigns are being very strategic in how they manage their sites for performance,” said Peter Kacandes, senior product marketing manager at AppDynamics. “Making those changes for debate night to speed up their sites is a smart move in anticipation of a lot of new traffic. Those new visitors are going to have a good experience, performance-wise. It’s a trade-off, though, because you want a rich content experience, too. Between the debates, they went back to their heavier pages — which in the case of Bush, was more than four times the debate night weight — 8.3 megabytes versus 2.0. That’s a huge difference.”
Frontrunner Donald Trump, whose debate responses some pundits called “lightweight,” has a website that is consistently lightweight as well, but that contributes to its frontrunner status, performance-wise, so in that respect it’s a winning strategy. Weighing in at just about one megabyte, the Trump site is loading on desktops consistently in less than three seconds, and on 4G in just over four seconds, both well ahead of the rest of the candidates.
Carly Fiorina’s debate performance was perhaps the most applauded of all the candidates. The performance of her website, though, has been lackluster, with page-load times hovering in the mid-teens on both desktop and 4G.
“When you look at all the candidates’ website performance, as a group their end-user response time is not all that impressive, but that can be deceptive,” Kacandes says. “In most cases, their ‘time to first render’ is acceptable. Fiorina’s site, for example, has a first-render time on desktop of 3.4 seconds, which most users would consider acceptable.”
Here is how the websites performed on average before the debate, measured on Tuesday, 9/15, and then during and immediately following the debate (top three performers in each category shown in white):
End-User Response Time* (seconds)
End-User Response Time
* End-User Response Time: Defined as the time perceived by an end-user for the complete page to download
AppDynamics measured the ten candidates’ websites from two locations, one on the East Coast and one on the West Coast, using the Google Chrome web browser. While the actual experience of end users varies due to a variety of factors, the synthetic measurements that AppDynamics provides offer an accurate, relative ranking of the performance of the candidates’ websites.
AppDynamics will be measuring the campaign websites of the top presidential candidates every month throughout the election cycle.
The AppDynamics Application Intelligence Platform is a comprehensive solution enabling companies and government entities to maximize business and application performance. The platform is designed and architected to help give business and government users the confidence that their applications are running at their best, to give IT personnel the operational visibility and control they need, and to give end users the great experiences they’ve come to expect and demand.
For regular news and information about AppDynamics and the APM market, like and follow the company on:
A free trial of AppDynamics is available atwww.appdynamics.com/freetrial
AppDynamics is the Application Intelligence company. With AppDynamics, enterprises have real-time insights into application performance, user performance and business performance so they can move faster in an increasingly sophisticated, software-driven world. Our integrated suite of products is built on our innovative, enterprise-grade App iQ Platform that enables our customers to make faster decisions that enhance customer engagement and improve operational and business performance. AppDynamics is uniquely positioned to enable enterprises to accelerate their digital transformations by actively monitoring, analyzing, and optimizing complex application environments at scale which has led to proven success and trust with the Global 2000. For more information, visit appdynamics.com.
AppDynamics reserves the right to change any planned features at any time before making them generally available as well as never making them generally available. Any buying decisions should be made based on features that are currently generally available.
AppDynamics is a registered trademark of AppDynamics, Inc. © 2008-2016 AppDynamics, Inc. All rights reserved. All other product and company names herein may be trademarks of their registered owners.